Change Of Control Bonus Agreement

To gain the upper hand today over the change-of-control negotiations, Gourley said, «You better be hot things!» Who needs it? While control modification provisions are more likely to be found in senior management contracts, such schemes appear at the intermediate administration level. For example, some companies extend retention bonuses to lower levels of management to avoid a «mass exodus» in the event of a change of ownership. Why write it? «The usual reason why prudential rules are taken by boards of directors is not to divert management`s attention from the question of whether the company is being taken over and to keep it objective and neutral,» says Michael Sirkin, Head of Compensation Practices at Proskauer Rose LLP. However, the reasons for the use of the amendable provisions differ from organization to organization. They are sometimes used to attract turnaround talent to smaller and troubled companies. However, in today`s active DM environment, large companies recognize that the stability they have been able to offer may not be as strong as they would like. That is why they must make arrangements for management in the event of a change of control. Regardless of the size of an organization, executives could be subject to dual responsibilities, relocations or downgrades when merging or taking over a business – totally unfavourable results. «However, by changing control, the executive might be better able to find other solutions to the problem than simply taking the business further down the ground,» Tyler suggests. It is not only the amount of compensation for the executive, but also how that compensation will be paid.

Decisions will have a significant impact on future tax issues. For example, under section 280G of the IRC, target companies cannot deduct changes to taxable income if three requirements are met: first, where there is a change of control or ownership; second, when payment is made to a «disqualified person» who, as defined by the IRS, is any self-employed employee or contractor with shares valued at just value greater than 1% of the fair value of the outstanding shares of the company. Third, the entire compensation package for the change in control must be equalled or greater than three times the base salary of the disqualified individual. If these three conditions are met, executives are subject to an excise duty of 20 per cent on all payments above their base salaries. (For more information on this provision, see www.irs.gov. According to Sirkin, there are three common types of triggers: a «single trigger» provides for a leader who resigns at the time of the transition. A «double trigger» occurs when an officer is terminated for a predetermined period after the change of control comes into effect.

Comments are closed.